Andrey Aleksandrovich Lagunovich
He has issued convictions in politically motivated cases since 2017, where he imposed a fine in the total amount of at least 4,654 rubles and administrative arrest for at least 74 days. He was engaged in the prosecution of former judges for their entry in the Book of Comments and Suggestions of the Rogachevsky Court, for which they were sentenced to 2 years of correctional labor. He imposed a fine on Belsat journalists. He sentenced the activists beaten by riot police in the form of administrative arrest for participating in the action. Convicted Vladimir Koshko under Article 203-1 of the Criminal Code - Illegal actions regarding information about private life and personal data. He was accused of transferring to the administrator of a Telegram channel, which the authorities recognized as extremist, the personal data of 27 police officers. Lagunovich decided to recover from the man compensation for moral damage to the victims in the amount of 13,600 rubles, and also sentenced him to 3 months of administrative arrest. Convicted 51-year-old Mikhail Latyshav under Article 24.23 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Republic of Belarus (Violation of the procedure for holding mass events) for picketing, because The man had a small white-red-white flag hanging on his balcony for 7 years. Mikhail was sentenced to a fine of 20 basic units and his phone was confiscated before he paid this amount. Participated in the case against Gomel blogger Maxim Filipovich. For politically motivated sentences, he was included in the third package of sanctions against the Belarusian authorities, approved by the EU in December 2020. In February 2021, an updated sanctions list against Belarusian officials compiled by the UK appeared
He has issued convictions in politically motivated cases since 2017, where he imposed a fine in the total amount of at least 4,654 rubles and administrative arrest for at least 74 days. He was engaged in the prosecution of former judges for their entry in the Book of Comments and Suggestions of the Rogachevsky Court, for which they were sentenced to 2 years of correctional labor. He imposed a fine on Belsat journalists. He sentenced the activists beaten by riot police in the form of administrative arrest for participating in the action. Convicted Vladimir Koshko under Article 203-1 of the Criminal Code - Illegal actions regarding information about private life and personal data. He was accused of transferring to the administrator of a Telegram channel, which the authorities recognized as extremist, the personal data of 27 police officers. Lagunovich decided to recover from the man compensation for moral damage to the victims in the amount of 13,600 rubles, and also sentenced him to 3 months of administrative arrest. Convicted 51-year-old Mikhail Latyshav under Article 24.23 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Republic of Belarus (Violation of the procedure for holding mass events) for picketing, because The man had a small white-red-white flag hanging on his balcony for 7 years. Mikhail was sentenced to a fine of 20 basic units and his phone was confiscated before he paid this amount. Participated in the case against Gomel blogger Maxim Filipovich. For politically motivated sentences, he was included in the third package of sanctions against the Belarusian authorities, approved by the EU in December 2020. In February 2021, an updated sanctions list against Belarusian officials compiled by the UK appeared
List of repressed
Dmitry was convicted in August 2022 of "organizing and preparing actions that grossly violate public order, or actively participating in them," for participating in peaceful protests that took place in Minsk in 2020. Dmitry was captured on video by a journalist at the protests in the first days after the elections.
In May 2023, it became known that Dmitry was detained in a correctional facility and tried under an administrative article for "dissemination of extremist materials," and sentenced to administrative arrest, which he served in the Gomel temporary detention facility.
In July of that year, a court hearing was held to discuss the issue of replacing the restriction of freedom with imprisonment in a penal colony; the outcome of the hearing is unknown.
